snarkbot: (caught a common gold)
Skeets (u lil shit) ([personal profile] snarkbot) wrote2016-09-04 09:44 pm
Entry tags:

MoM/BX9/SKEETS/_IC_CONTACT



/ TEXT | VOICE | VIDEO | BWITTER | IM | ACTION \
reexamined: (021)

[personal profile] reexamined 2017-09-08 03:38 am (UTC)(link)
It's regarding your human form. When you change. What would you consider the 'pros' and 'cons' to that state, as well as is it a form that must be maintained through constant focus, or more like a switch?
reexamined: (048)

[personal profile] reexamined 2017-09-08 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)
It does.

I have no desire to be human for my own "benefit" but I have come into several situations where the simulations I've run turn out more favorable, if I had been human for those situations. By refusing to change, I am intentionally making those solutions inaccessible, when they could greatly affect the outcome.

Does this sound like a reasonable conclusion to come to?
reexamined: (069)

[personal profile] reexamined 2017-09-10 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)
If I'm to try this out, for my first time changing, I would prefer to be in your company. If possible.

You already have experience with this, and would know what to expect.


[And also his pride would be damaged if he fucked up being human in front a human. Skeets, not so much.]
Edited 2017-09-10 19:49 (UTC)
reexamined: (039)

[personal profile] reexamined 2017-09-11 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
Soon would be appreciated, but your schedule is more complex than mine.

[A PAUSE.]

I also don't know where I should do this. If I do it at my own housing unit, someone will see.
reexamined: (044)

[personal profile] reexamined 2017-09-12 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
Today? That's. Very soon.
reexamined: (056)

[personal profile] reexamined 2017-09-12 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
I would ... rather Thursday. Thank you.